Would you like to be a successful SEO? Well, who does not, is not it?

After being in the SEO space for more than 10 years ago I had the privilege of thousands of them. And like any industry, only a small percentage of them are managed effectively.

So it hit me ... why some of these SEOs are good at what they do, some do not? And after I about it for a while, I realized that it came to these seven habits.

First Effective SEO practice

It is not difficult to become a SEO. You can read about it online, you can buy a few books, and in a few weeks you will have the lingo down. At this point you can probably go through a few pages and tell them what they are doing wrong, but at the end of the day means you're a good SEO?

If you want to be good at SEO, you have to practice it ... and not only on customer sites. Create your own websites, build your own links and track your rankings. How do you learn what you get for your website to better help other people with their SEO.

The search world is constantly changing and it is impossible to stay up to date by reading news from the industry. You have no other choice than to practice them than to give you a better understanding of how you need to customize your concept to a higher rank.

Second Effective SEOs take risks

You have up to the limits! If you knew how many times I've been banned or penalized by Google and Yahoo for pushing the envelope, you would be shocked.

Now I say no way that you are doing something unethical or break Google's guidelines, but what I'm saying is that you learn, have to be aggressive.

If you're aggressive with your sites, you will learn quickly, which helps to increase rankings and what not. For example, you already know that white hat link building increases rankings. But did you know that if you build links with a slow and steady pace, you can place someone who builds the same kind of links too fast?

If I'm not aggressive with my link building, I would have never learned to know that You are not afraid to push the envelope.

Third Effective SEOs build relationships

People knew me in the SEO space for the use of social media sites to create links. I was the first SEO really use sites like Digg, StumbleUpon and Delicious. I was so good at one point I had to get a 75% success rate on the Digg homepage ... and there was upward from a top-100-I users.

How do I do that? Well it was not because these social sites I knew better than anyone else, but I just networked my way to the top.

By building relationships with other users on these pages, I was able to learn the ins and outs. That's what helped me to succeed.

Whether you are trying to better themselves on page SEO or link building, you should never stop networking. The more relationships you build, the better you are. For example, I built a relationship with a blogger 2 years ago and now he is writing a guest more than 40 popular blogs. Because of our relationship that he left me on these blogs, if he sees fit, and I do not even have to condemn, to do him a penny of this. He just does it because we are friends now.

4th Effective SEOs are creative

SEO is not new. Everyone does it, and there is not much that a secret these days. But the people who tend to really good, those who are creative, as you have a big advantage.

Remember Mingle 2? The dating site, which was bought by just to say hi ...

The guy behind SEO, Matt Inman could Mingle 2 get to become a popular dating site, because he leveraged quiz. Users loved these tests so much that after taking them, they would integrate their guests on her blog.

Matt is also the guy behind oatmeal. This site has a ton of SEO juice, because Matt is creative when it comes to link building. Whether Quiz, comics or anything he can think what he prefers Matt to do with SEO creativity.

If you are creative, they're using. It gives you a head start, but you have to move fast as the competitors to your creative tactics caught sooner or later.

5th Effective SEOs are analytical

The ability to rank keywords is one thing, but if you do not know what to rank you have no luck. The last thing you want is to spend your efforts on ranking for a keyword, do not increase your revenue.

Of being good at keyword research to conversion tracking, and even optimizing landing pages, knows what is good SEOs are not just for traffic. It's about increasing revenue.

Do not focus 100% of your time on building traffic only. Learn more about Web Analytics and focus on maximizing revenue. And stop it ... Track all that you can follow what. Of your competitors' rankings to what they do, the more data, the better you will be in decision making.

6th Effective SEOs use multiple tactics

SEOs have a tendency, one thing that helps increase rankings in the search and that's all they use. Whether it changes to an on-site SEO that really helps to link design. Do not get caught with a tactical ... even if it works.

When I started, I was caught with the tactics of reciprocal linking. My rank and explodes after a year to do it crashed search engines caught on it and my rankings. Then I concentrated my efforts on the construction of all links from high PageRank pages. This worked well because my PageRank increased by 8 and my rankings went, but search engines caught on that.

To make the point that I try is that you do not rely on a tactic to achieve high rankings. You have to diversify, as SEO is a constant game of cat and mouse ... even if you use ethical tactics.

7th Effective SEOs never rely on SEO

I know this may sound strange, but effective SEO knows, that you can not just rely on SEO. For example, press the Panda update a few pages, although they had good content. Many of these sites increased from the Panda, but it shows that you simply do not trust on SEO.

If you try to increase your traffic should consider, please, try banner advertising, email marketing, pay-per-click ads, and everything you can imagine. This will help diversify the channels that are driving your income so if something happens to your organic search traffic, you are still able to survive.

SEO is great, but you need to learn other marketing skills. I even began as an SEO, but these days I get most of my traffic through busy business development.
Completion

If you already have to follow the seven habits I mentioned above, great ... you are an effective SEO.

But if not, do not worry, because it is not too late to start. Just do not be hard to focus on all these habits at once, as it is, in order to conquer all. Instead, they hit one after another, until you complete the list.

Do you know any other habits, to make the effective SEOs?

These filtered words can hinder your SEO efforts, especially when it is used frequently in the page title. You are wasting valuable space effectively, especially in the title tag (which is usually greatest home run hitter of your website for SEO). It is recommended that these words from your title tag, be dispensed with if possible.





Below is a comprehensive list of words Ignored by Search Engines.

A

able about above abroad according accordingly across actually after afterwards

again against ago ahead ain’t all allow allows almost alone

along alongside already also although always am amid amidst among

amongst an and another any anybody anyhow anyone anything anyway

anyways anywhere apart appear appreciate appropriate are aren’t around as

aside ask asking associated at available away awfully

B

back backward backwards be became because become becomes becoming been

before beforehand begin behind being believe below beside besides best

better between beyond both brief but by

C

came can cannot cant can’t caption cause causes certain certainly

changes clearly c’mon come comes concerning consequently consider considering contain

containing contains corresponding could couldn’t course currently

D

dare daren’t definitely described despite did didn’t different directly do

does doesn’t doing done don’t down downwards during

E

each eight eighty either else elsewhere end ending enough entirely especially

etc even ever evermore every everybody everyone everything everywhere ex

exactly example except

F

fairly far farther few fewer fifth first five followed following

follows for forever former formerly forth forward found four from

further furthermore

G

get gets getting given gives go goes going gone got

gotten greetings

H

had hadn’t half happens hardly has hasn’t have haven’t having

he he’d he’ll hello help hence her here hereafter hereby

herein here’s hereupon hers herself he’s hi him himself his hither

hopefully how however hundred

I

i’d if ignored i’ll i’m immediate in inc inc. indeed

indicate indicated indicates inner inside instead into inward is isn’t

it it’d it’ll its it’s itself i’ve

J

just

K

keep keeps kept know known knows

L

last lately later latter latterly least less lest let let’s

like liked likely likewise little look looking looks low lower

M

made mainly make makes many may maybe mayn’t me mean

meantime meanwhile merely might mine minus miss more moreover most

mostly mr mrs much must mustn’t my myself

N

‘

name namely near nearly necessary need needn’t needs neither never

neverf neverless nevertheless new next nine ninety no nobody non

none nonetheless nor normally not nothing notwithstanding novel now nowhere

O

obviously of off often oh ok okay old on once

one ones one’s only onto opposite or other others otherwise

ought oughtn’t our ours ourselves out outside over overall own

P

particular particularly past per perhaps placed please plus possible presumably

probably provided provides

Q

que quite

R

rather really reasonably recent recently regarding regardless regards relatively respectively

right round

S

said same saw say saying says second secondly see seeing

seem seemed seeming seems seen self selves sensible sent serious

seriously seven several shall shan’t she she’d she’ll she’s should

shouldn’t since six so some somebody someday somehow someone something

sometime sometimes somewhat somewhere soon sorry specified specify specifying still

sub such sure

T

take taken taking tell tends than thank thanks thanx that

that’ll thats that’s that’ve the their theirs them themselves then

thence there thereafter thereby there’d therefore therein there’ll there’re theres

there’s thereupon there’ve these they they’d they’ll they’re they’ve thing

things think third thirty this thorough thoroughly those though three

through throughout thru thus till to together too took toward

towards tried tries truly try trying twice two

U

under underneath undoing unfortunately unless unlike unlikely until unto up

upon upwards us use used useful uses using usually

V

value various versus very via vs vs.

W

want wants was wasn’t way we we’d welcome well we’ll

went were we’re weren’t we’ve what whatever what’ll what’s what’ve

when whence whenever where whereafter whereas whereby wherein where’s whereupon

wherever whether which whichever while whilst whither who who’d whoever

whole who’ll whom whomever who’s whose why will willing wish

with within without wonder won’t would wouldn’t

X

none

Y

yes yet you you’d you’ll your you’re yours yourself yourselves

you’ve

Z

zero

The "Internet Reformation" (as we call it) is a natural outgrowth of our perception that the 'Net itself is a kind of modern-day Gutenberg Press. It's a concept we've been writing about for nearly a decade. Initially, it seemed like an interesting theory, but everything keeps falling into place and the historical parallels are startling. What they seem to reveal is an upcoming electronically-based Renaissance of sorts.

This is of course not necessarily a popular view. The alternative Internet media is often relentlessly gloomy. One is bombarded daily with information about the 5,000-year-old evil of the Illuminati, the impossibility of stopping the New World Order, the invulnerability of the world's great banking families such as the Rothschilds and Rockefellers who are said to control tens or even hundreds of trillions.

And yet, look around. Despite the challenges, there is plenty of evidence of pushback. And why shouldn't this trend continue, no matter what counterattacks are made?

Look at history. The Catholic Church launched its Counter-Reformation but wasn't successful in stopping either Lutheranism or Protestantism. The elites of the day tried to license printing presses but were not successful. They tried to confiscate books as well. Finally, they tried war, but eventually had to declare a peace via the Treaty of Westphalia that established the modern nation state.

What was seemingly at work then, as now, is Marshall McLuhan's "hive mind." People may scoff at the concept of a hive mind, but humans are seemingly structured to seize on the most modern concepts as part of the struggle to survive and get ahead. The stale nostrums of the modern Dark Age – the 20th century – are giving way to a dawn of knowledge hitherto repressed by the power elite.

The discovery of the 10,000 year-old-city of Dwarka off the coast of India, the probable reality of a universe organized by electricity rather than gravity, the existence of abiotic oil generated by geological processes, the reality of vitamin therapy and naturopathy have all found popularity on the Internet – along with the free-market economics of Austrians such as Ludwig von Mises. Twenty years ago, such concepts and discoveries would not have been mentioned, generally, let alone circulated.


 The Internet has begun to blow up power elite memes – the fear-based promotions by which the Anglo-American elites have sought to control society. Literally trillions of dollars have been thrown into an effort to create a network of political structures (UN, IMF, BIS, etc.), think tanks, educational facilities and popular media that can amplify these dominant social themes. Once they have become part of the public consciousness, authoritarian and globalist solutions are inevitably proposed. It looks like a natural process but in fact, it is an entirely artificial one.

The same process takes place as regards investing. Fear-based themes such as global warming are promoted with increasing fervor over years and decades. International political solutions are introduced along with corporate solutions. Companies large and small proclaim "green" solutions even though global warming has been massively discredited.

And the scale at which the Anglo-American power elite works is almost unfathomable, and the current conspiracy to create One World Government probably goes back at least 300 years. From bases in the City of London, the Vatican and Washington DC, seep deliberate promotions – often seemingly honed within the Tavistock Institute. A handful of great banking families along with their religious, corporate and military facilitators, go to work to waft them around the world.

Once the dominant social themes and sub themes are distributed via the controlled mainstream media, the UN and other internationalist institutions produce solutions that inevitably involve more control for the globalists at the expense of the world's unknowing citizenry.

There are vast sums of money to be made as well within this great game of mind control. Private companies are provided with "solutions" to the elite promotions of the day. These entities, controlled by the elites, funded by their hedge funds and private money, are gradually released onto the world's great exchanges.

Once the companies are public, cash is funneled back to its inevitable elite destination where the "wisemen" have vast seed positions at virtually no cost. The great families and their facilitators siphon off proceeds from their manipulations and invest the funds in more tangible assets such as real estate, oil and precious metals. The real estate is developed; the oil is marketed; the gold and silver finds its way back to Switzerland where it is stored in deep vaults and subject to off-the-books accounting by Switzerland's many private banks.

It is probably that simple. First they seed the fear, then they deliver the dreams, then they blow off their 8.5 x 11 pieces of paper into smaller pieces of paper (fiat money), then they quickly convert that devaluing paper into tangible assets. Central banks are the control hub that gives the elite this power through money creation. Mainstream media is complicit in aiding and abetting the entire societal wealth-draining process, which is cloaked under a statist religion we call "regulatory democracy."

This is the process that seems to have emerged painstakingly over the past century.The artificial business cycle itself helps consolidate this centralization. It is a work of virtual genius that has been elaborated on patiently over decades and centuries. Fortunately for the rest of the world, the Internet and its billions of bloggers and viewers has exposed every part of its operations. This is becoming a problem for the elites as the dollar reserve currency gradually collapses along with faith in individual securities investing to generate retirement income.

All these manipulations are increasingly exposed. How do I know? You're reading this article aren't you? And even those who do not read this article may read similar analyses elsewhere. The same thing happened once the Gutenberg Press was discovered. People read the bible for themselves in vulgate and began to realize that the current corrupt version of the Roman Catholic Church did not correspond to the Holy Word. The word spread; revolutions and regime changes began.

It's happening today for the same reasons. There were financial crises in Europe when the Gutenberg Press was expanding its influence. The financial crises combined with the explosion of information offered by books to create the Renaissance.

The elites of the day tried to manipulate the explosion of knowledge via the Reformation (to split the Catholic church) and by fomenting the French Revolution. But for several hundred years, nothing worked as it should. Secret history seems to show us that no matter what the elites of the day did, freedom and knowledge expanded.

We are still at the beginning of such a point of departure. The elites, having created a second, electronic printing press by mistake may now have to take a step back as they did before, 500 years ago. One can see knowledge spreading.

Google's search engine provides us with literally tens of millions of cites for Mises, Hayek and free-market economics. There is a great hunger for information about free-markets and free-market thinking and the Internet has made it possible to satisfy that need.

It seems to have taken about 100 years for the Gutenberg Press to spark the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Enlightenment, the Glorious Revolution, the American Revolution, the French Revolution and numerous other social changes. The impact of the Gutenberg Press likely was responsible for a number of ill-defined "Peasant" wars as well, that raged across Europe for 30 years.

The wars were so numerous finally and so wide-ranging that the European leadership of the day had to convene a peace conference in Westphalia that lasted a full decade. Out of it emerged the concept of an inviolate nation state. No country had the right to attack another.

This Peace of Westphalia was deliberately overturned by the UN Security Council in 2005. Something called the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) was substituted in its place. R2P virtually demands that if a leadership is "threatening" it citizens, the big Western powers have an affirmative obligation to intervene. R2P has now embroiled the West in numerous major, military confrontations.

One of the ways that the elites responded to the advent of the Gutenberg Press was through war – and more war. Various low-key wars spread across the length and breadth of Europe. It didn't do much good, though. The Renaissance still happened. The Reformation spun out of control. British royalty was overthrown. The New World was discovered and populated. Freedom was rediscovered and the scientific method was introduced.

One can make a case (and we have) that this paradigm, exactly, is repeating itself. It may be true that an Internet false flag event is being planned by Western elites. War on a false enemy may be declared as a result – and laws passed to restrict the Internet and block the alternative media – all in an attempt to stop truth-telling. But while many who are predicting the demise of the Internet (as a facility for the free dispersal of knowledge), I don't.

There are signs of what is to come. The hacker group Lulzsec recently took down the CIA web site after attacking US Congress web facilities as well. Some have claimed Lulzsec is itself a front for US Intel agencies. Suspicions have been raised as well about the hacker group Anonymous. We reported the other day about CIA Director Leon Panetta, who said in a recent hearing that the US may soon face a cyber attack that would be the equivalent of Pearl Harbor. Alternative Internet websites increasingly have been filled with articles about potential false-flag events.

Over at Washington's Blog, for example, we find an article on false flags entitled, Are Hacker Attacks False Flag Attacks to Justify a Crackdown on the Internet? Washington relates how former Counter Terrorism Czar Richard Clarke told a leading expert on internet free speech, Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig, that there was going to be an "i-9/11″, in other words, an electronic terrorist act, and an "i-Patriot Act" to crack down on freedoms on the Internet under the guise of protecting against such threats.

Washington, like many from the blogosphere, believes that like The Patriot Act, an i-Patriot Act is "sitting in the drawers of the Justice Department for the last 20 years waiting for the event where they would pull it out." This may well be the case. But there are still stubbornly lingering questions over 9/11, with many, according to surveys, apparently harboring suspicions that 9/11 itself constituted some sort of false flag operation intended to start wars and introduce even more authoritarianism into the US.

If one goes online and queries Google with "Internet false flag" nearly FOUR MILLION cites turn up. There is a good deal of consciousness within the alternative press at this point about such potential false flags. A false flag by definition is a secret manipulation. How can an Internet false flag be introduced logically when everybody knows about it and is expecting it?

There are many ways it can happen of course. But in fact, with secrecy all but undermined as regards these black ops, the Anglosphere elite that surely wishes to undermine the Internet Reformation is going to run into considerable pushback if it tries one of these operations. This is not to say it won't happen, only that it may not be nearly as effective as some are now predicting.

This article has tried to show that what is occurring today with respect to a major societal shift in understanding also happened 500 years ago with the advent of the Gutenberg Press. The parallels exist for anyone who wishes to scrutinize them and the affinity of the trend lines are being drawn realtime.

The elites of the day seemingly could not control the ramifications of the Gutenberg Press no matter what they tried to do, and they evidently tried everything from war, to licensing, to false flag events and social manipulation. It didn't matter; force never solves anything longer term. Indeed, "the pen is mightier than the sword." Now, nearly 600 years after Gutenberg's original invention of mass conversation, a "great shift" – Internet Reformation – has begun anew.

Of course, analyzing history in hindsight is a difficult occupation. Certainly people can come to a different conclusion, or even entirely reject this analysis as facile. But for me the parallels are clear. The Internet Reformation itself may prove a great deal more resilient than some now believe. The human hive mind is busy buzzing. The spread of knowledge – real knowledge – continues. The Dark Ages of the 20th century begin to lift and Dreamtime subsides. Information about free-markets continues to spread. Are these trends reversible? Don't think so.

Source:  The Daily Bell

 
About Ariticle Author

I read the so-called SEO experts to keep the cross-linking is useless (from the perspective of a Google ranking), but they never supplied the proof. It's all fiction, real scientific evidence is collated.


I also reciprocal (though not in the classic sense) do not, but many links back and forth my own website (a lot) and it is great because of Google, some of my sites, the correlation Hamere from other sites and my sites over 20,000 unique visitors a day visit. How to downgrade some of the inter-linking my sites my websites decreasing number of traffic back and forth so (all links will be useless) would like to see links. Yet my traffic affiliate materials (thin affiliate sites links no matter how many die in traffic wise) use of sites keeps growing.

What I have here a classic problem with reciprocal linking is useless to add to mutual impression.

Reciprocal Links Exam.

PR than the pages with links to each page equivalent of 10.

Page (PR4) page (PR4) B which links back to the link: overall profit / loss or negligible in PR for the site. The relevant anchor text (anchor text handling is good) access to a link to increase ranking small.

Page (PR5) Page B-Links (PR4), which links back: B benefits / PR Links Page a site / PR links lose benefits. Benefits due to the anchor text, but page B also has a small profit PR (not much though because it's a link back) which helps at the expense of Page A.

Page (PR7) Page B (PR2) link back to the link: B benefits / PR Links Page is a site / PR links lose benefits. Benefits due to the anchor text, but page B-profit PR / link benefit a huge amount helps a lot.!

How often do you lose a PR7 links you can setup the page PR? Not very often, so the reciprocal result in reduced benefits passed. This correlation does not mean Google downgraded, it is the nature of reciprocal linking.


Comparition with Non Reciprocal Linking

Page (PR4) page B links (PR4) which do not link back: B-profit PR / link benefit page is a site lose PR. If the page B of the one-way links are a fair number of reciprocal links that PR is a lot faster than a similar number will rise.

A page (PR7) page B links (PR4) which do not link back to: Page B-PR links / benefit gain a lot of pages a site loses a lot of PR. Page B only and may thus be a link to PR5 PR6 the next update is needed. Reciprocal links link like this for a year until at least 9 months of age will not help. Because it is not mutual for the PR to other pages on the site and the page will be sent a not back partially.

Finally, reciprocal links from Google are not ignored, but for the same reason not expect miracles from a handful of reciprocal links, chances are you are sending away as much benefit as you win.